DealSCREEN
DealSCREEN

Practical Insights for deal teams

More deals in-scope

as a result of governments and regulators putting in place a broader range of tools to screen M&A transactions. As geopolitical uncertainty continues, we expect this trend to continue.

Fragmentation, complexity and divergence

are being driven by changing policy considerations (e.g. national security, economic resilience). This can lead to significant differences in process, approach and the issues that are regulators are concerned about.

Clearance is achievable for most deals

with the majority cleared without remedies and few prohibitions. Where concerns arise, remedies are a common route to clearance, even for FDI (where intervention is more frequent). In merger control, regulators are showing more flexibility in the types of remedies they will accept.

More deals in-scope

as a result of governments and regulators putting in place a broader range of tools to screen M&A transactions. As geopolitical uncertainty continues, we expect this trend to continue.

Fragmentation, complexity and divergence

are being driven by changing policy considerations (e.g. national security, economic resilience). This can lead to significant differences in process, approach and the issues that are regulators are concerned about.

Clearance is achievable for most deals

with the majority cleared without remedies and few prohibitions. Where concerns arise, remedies are a common route to clearance, even for FDI (where intervention is more frequent). In merger control, regulators are showing more flexibility in the types of remedies they will accept.

Preparation is key to success

With broader regimes, wider policy considerations and more regulators involved, early and proactive preparation is essential to manage issues effectively. Ensuring consistency of messaging across regulators is key.

Preparation is key to success

With broader regimes, wider policy considerations and more regulators involved, early and proactive preparation is essential to manage issues effectively. Ensuring consistency of messaging across regulators is key.

What this means for deal planning?

What this means for deal planning?

Regulatory planning starts earlier

It is key to consider merger control, FDI and other regimes at the very outset of deals so that structure, timing, pricing and risk allocation can be shaped upfront.

Regulation is impacting deal timing

Regulatory scrutiny is extending long-stop dates for some deals (in some cases for up to 12–18 months), while unproblematic transactions benefit from faster merger control timelines.

Focus on risk-sharing provisions

As US agencies accept remedies again, ‘hell or high water’ clauses (commitments to do everything necessary to obtain regulatory approvals) are back in focus and are now negotiated more commonly than break fees.

Managing the gap period

With more deals subject to regulatory review, gap controls are increasingly negotiated, particularly for deals with extended gap periods. These include termination rights, material adverse change clauses and claims for breaches of warranties or gap covenants.

Regulatory planning starts earlier
Regulation is impacting deal timing
Focus on risk-sharing provisions
Managing the gap period
It is key to consider merger control, FDI and other regimes at the very outset of deals so that structure, timing, pricing and risk allocation can be shaped upfront.
Regulatory scrutiny is extending long-stop dates for some deals (in some cases for up to 12–18 months), while unproblematic transactions benefit from faster merger control timelines.
As US agencies accept remedies again, ‘hell or high water’ clauses (commitments to do everything necessary to obtain regulatory approvals) are back in focus and are now negotiated more commonly than break fees.
With more deals subject to regulatory review, gap controls are increasingly negotiated, particularly for deals with extended gap periods. These include termination rights, material adverse change clauses and claims for breaches of warranties or gap covenants.

Regulatory planning starts earlier

It is key to consider merger control, FDI and other regimes at the very outset of deals so that structure, timing, pricing and risk allocation can be shaped upfront.

Regulation is impacting deal timing

Regulatory scrutiny is extending long-stop dates for some deals (in some cases for up to 12–18 months), while unproblematic transactions benefit from faster merger control timelines.

Focus on risk-sharing provisions

As US agencies accept remedies again, ‘hell or high water’ clauses (commitments to do everything necessary to obtain regulatory approvals) are back in focus and are now negotiated more commonly than break fees.

Managing the gap period

With more deals subject to regulatory review, gap controls are increasingly negotiated, particularly for deals with extended gap periods. These include termination rights, material adverse change clauses and claims for breaches of warranties or gap covenants.

Explore the trends shaping deal-making


Explore the trends shaping deal-making


Trend 1

Geopolitics recalibrates how M&A is regulated

Learn more

Trend 2

FDI regimes expand reach and outpace merger control

Learn more

Trend 3

Clearances rates generally stay high but FDI regimes toughen stance

Learn more

Trend 4

Closing enforcement gaps in merger control

Learn more

Trend 5

Competition authorities remain focused on transactions between competitors but continue to consider supply chain consolidation

Learn more

Trend 6

Behavioural remedies prevail in FDI while merger control strikes a new balance

Learn more

Trend 7

Penalty risk is uneven and often opaque

Learn more

© Eversheds Sutherland. All rights reserved. Eversheds Sutherland is a global provider of legal and other services operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. Eversheds Sutherland is the name and brand under which the members of Eversheds Sutherland Limited (Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP and Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP) and their respective controlled, managed and affiliated firms and the members of Eversheds Sutherland (Europe) Limited (each an "Eversheds Sutherland Entity" and together the "Eversheds Sutherland Entities") provide legal or other services to clients around the world. Eversheds Sutherland Entities are constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local regulatory and legal requirements and operate in accordance with their locally registered names. The use of the name Eversheds Sutherland, is for description purposes only and does not imply that the Eversheds Sutherland Entities are in a partnership or are part of a global LLP. The responsibility for the provision of services to the client is defined in the terms of engagement between the instructed firm and the client.

Connect with us

linkedin logo
facebook icon
youtube icon