USA
Illinois – Neonatal intensive care leave
Impact date: 1 June 2026
Under the Neonatal Intensive Care Leave Act (NICLA), when the child of an employee is a patient in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), Illinois employers must provide:
- ten days of unpaid leave (employers with 16-49 employees)
- 20 days of unpaid leave (employers with 50+ employees)
Leave may be taken intermittently or consecutively, is in addition to Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave and is tacked on at the end of FMLA leave. Employers may not require employees to substitute accrued paid leave prior to taking NICLA leave, and employees must be reinstated to their former position or a substantially equivalent position with no loss of benefits held or accrued prior to taking leave.
Employers may require “reasonable verification” of the child’s NICU stay but cannot request any confidential information protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) or any other law.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with 16 or more employees in Illinois should note the new requirements and take steps to update their leave policies accordingly.
Employer risk The Illinois Department of Labor (IDOL) can impose penalties up to $5,000 per violation and can assess other damages such as unpaid wages and further penalties, with 80% of the amount collected going to the employee. Employees have 60 days from the last event constituting the alleged violation (e.g., not returning employee to prior/similar position, retaliating at a later date, or forcing employee to use paid leave) to file a claim with the IDOL or a lawsuit in court.
Link N/A
Tennessee – Non-compete agreements
Impact date: 1 July 2026
Two new changes have been made to the State’s non-compete landscape:
- non-competes are now prohibited for employees who earn less than $70,000 in annualized compensation. Annualized compensation represents all forms of income including wages, commissions and bonuses. Hourly annualized compensation is determined by the employee’s hourly rate multiplied by 40 (hours in a week) multiplied by 52 (weeks in a year) and
- a rebuttable presumption of reasonableness applies regarding the duration of non-compete agreements. Depending on the type of relationship involved, certain time periods are presumed reasonable, while longer restrictions are presumed unreasonable, unless sufficient evidence is presented to rebut that presumption.
Only agreements entered into after 1 July 2026, are subject to these new standards.
Employer implications/action needed Employers should review their employment contracts, restrictive covenant agreements and template documentation to ensure compliance with the new requirements. In particular, employers should verify whether employees meet the compensation threshold before entering into a non-compete agreement and review the duration of any proposed restrictions to ensure they align with the new statutory framework.
Employer risk Employers that continue to use non-compete agreements that do not comply with the new requirements may face legal challenges regarding the enforceability of those restrictions. Businesses with large numbers of employees may be particularly affected if non-compliant provisions are used across multiple contracts, potentially increasing legal and compliance risks.
Link N/A
Virginia– Non-compete agreements
Impact date: 1 July 2026
Non-compete agreements may be unenforceable if an employer terminates an employee without cause and does not provide severance pay or other financial compensation. The legislation does not define what constitutes "cause" and does not specify a minimum amount of severance pay or compensation that must be provided. Any severance pay or other financial compensation that may be payable in these circumstances must be disclosed when the non-compete agreement is entered into.
The new rules apply only to non-compete agreements that are entered into, amended or renewed on or after 1 July 2026. These changes operate alongside Virginia's existing restrictions on the use of non-compete agreements.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with employees in Virginia should review their employment contracts, non-compete agreements and template documentation to ensure compliance with the new requirements. In particular, employers should consider whether severance pay or other compensation will be offered if an employee is dismissed without cause and ensure that any such arrangements are appropriately disclosed when entering into a non-compete agreement.
Employer risk Employers that fail to comply with the new requirements may be unable to enforce non-compete agreements against affected employees. Non-compliant provisions may also increase the risk of litigation, employee claims and court intervention, particularly where non-compete agreements are used widely across the workforce.
Link N/A
Georgia – Portable benefits plan for independent contractors
Impact date: 1 July 2026
Independent contractors in the state of Georgia may participate in a portable benefits plan without affecting their status as independent contractors. Under the new law, contractors may voluntarily contribute a portion of their earnings towards benefits such as health insurance, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, life insurance and retirement savings.
The legislation also permits businesses that engage independent contractors to contribute to these portable benefits plans on the contractor's behalf. Importantly, making or receiving these contributions does not, by itself, result in the contractor being classified as an employee
Employer implications/action needed Businesses that engage independent contractors should review whether they wish to offer contributions to portable benefits plans as part of their contractor engagement strategy. Any arrangements relating to such contributions should be appropriately documented, and existing contractor agreements may need to be reviewed and updated to reflect the new framework.
Employer risk Businesses should ensure that any documentation relating to portable benefits arrangements is carefully drafted and reviewed to ensure compliance with the new legislation and to minimize the risk of disputes regarding contractor status. While the legislation is intended to preserve independent contractor status, organizations should continue to assess worker classification arrangements more broadly and comply with all applicable legal requirements.
Link N/A
Illinois – Minimum wage increases in Chicago and Cook County
Impact date: 1 July 2026
The minimum wage rate in Chicago increased to $17.05/hour for non-tipped employees and $12.96/hour for tipped employees. The minimum wage rate in Cook County but outside Chicago increased to $15.40/hour for non-tipped employees and $9.25/hour for tipped employees.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with employees working in Chicago or Cook County should review pay rates for all affected employees to ensure compliance with the updated minimum wage requirements. Employers should also update payroll systems, budgeting assumptions and any wage-related communications or policies to reflect the new rates.
Employer risk Failure to comply with the applicable minimum wage requirements may result in employee claims, government enforcement action and financial liability for unpaid wages. Depending on the circumstances, employers may also be required to pay additional damages, interest, penalties and legal costs.
Link N/A
Virginia – Pay Transparency
Impact date: 1 July 2026
As of 1 July 2026 employers in Virginia must include a good-faith wage or salary range in all public and internal job postings, promotions, and transfers. Further, employers cannot ask about, seek, or rely on prior salary or wage history of prospective employees when hiring or making compensation decisions. The law also prevents an employer for not hiring or otherwise retaliating against a prospective employee for refusing to provide their salary or wage history.
Employer implications/action needed Employers should review hiring practices and be prepared to provide wage or salary ranges for such job postings.
Employer risk Failure to comply can result in the Attorney General bringing a cause of action to enforce the provision and penalties ranging from $1,000 to $5,000 per violation.
Link N/A
Connecticut – Warehouse employee productivity quota protections
Impact date: Effective 1 July 2026
Connecticut has introduced new protections for employees who are subject to productivity quotas, particularly in warehouse distribution centres. A productivity quota is a performance target that requires employees to complete a specified amount of work within a certain period.
Under the new law, covered employers may be required to provide employees with a written description of any productivity quotas that apply to them, together with details of any adverse consequences that may result from failing to meet those quotas. The law also provides that productivity quotas must not interfere with employees' legal rights, including meal breaks and access to restroom facilities. In addition, the law prohibits productivity quotas that measure required output over a period shorter than an employee's full workday. In practice, this means employers cannot require employees to achieve a specified level of productivity within shorter measurement periods, such as during particular portions of a shift, if the quota is based on output tracked over a period shorter than the employee's entire workday. Productivity quotas also cannot be based solely on an employee's ranking relative to other employees.
The legislation also introduces record-keeping requirements for employers that impose productivity quotas or collect and analyse employee work-speed data. Such employers must retain relevant records for at least three years. Upon request, an employee is entitled to receive:
- A written description of each productivity quota that applies to them.
- A copy of their individual work-speed data for the previous 90 days.
- A copy of aggregated work-speed data for comparable employees working at the same warehouse distribution centre for the previous 90 days.
Employer implications/action needed Employers operating warehouse distribution centres in Connecticut should review any productivity quota systems and employee monitoring practices to ensure compliance with the new requirements. Employers should also ensure that appropriate documentation, record-retention processes and employee communications are in place to meet the new disclosure obligations.
Employer risk Failure to comply with the legislation may result in civil penalties. The law provides for penalties of USD 1,000 for a first violation, USD 2,000 for a second violation and USD 3,000 for a third or subsequent violation. Employers may also face regulatory scrutiny and employee complaints relating to non-compliant productivity quota practices.
Link N/A
Indiana – Employment eligibility verification and immigration compliance
Impact date: Effective 1 July 2026
Indiana has introduced new requirements aimed at strengthening employer compliance with employment eligibility verification obligations. The Indiana Attorney General may seek court orders and penalties against employers that fail to exercise "reasonable diligence" when verifying that employees are legally authorized to work in the United States.
The legislation provides that reasonable diligence may include participation in the E-Verify system (the US federal electronic employment eligibility verification programme) or the use of other recognized industry-standard verification practices. The new provisions are intended to encourage employers to take active steps to confirm employees' right to work and maintain appropriate verification records.
Employer implications/action needed Employers in Indiana should review their recruitment, onboarding and employment verification procedures to ensure they comply with federal and state requirements. In particular, employers should ensure that Form I-9 employment eligibility verification requirements are completed correctly and within the required timeframe and consider whether their existing verification processes demonstrate "reasonable diligence" under the new law. Employers may also wish to review the use of E-Verify or other recognized verification practices.
Employer risk Employers that fail to comply with the new requirements may face enforcement action by the state. Potential consequences include court-ordered restrictions on business operations, probationary monitoring arrangements requiring regular reporting on hiring and employment practices, financial penalties and other sanctions available under the legislation. Non-compliance may also increase the risk of regulatory investigations and legal disputes.
Link N/A
New Jersey – Expansion of Family Leave Act coverage
Impact date: 17 July 2026
Eligibility for leave under the New Jersey Family Leave Act has been significantly expanded. The Act provides eligible employees with up to 12 weeks of job-protected leave during a 24-month period to care for a child or a family member with a serious health condition.
Previously, the Act generally applied only to employees who worked for an employer with 30 or more employees, had completed at least 12 months of service, and had worked at least 1,000 hours for that employer. Under the new rules, employees are eligible if they:
- Work for an employer with 15 or more employees;
- Have worked for the employer for at least three months; and
- Have completed at least 250 hours of work.
The changes significantly expand access to family leave by reducing both the employer-size threshold and the length of service and hours-worked requirements.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with employees in New Jersey should review their family leave policies, employee handbooks and leave-management procedures to ensure they reflect the expanded eligibility criteria. Employers should also be prepared to provide job-protected leave to employees who may previously have fallen outside the scope of the Act, particularly newer employees and those with shorter working hours.
Employer risk Failure to comply with the Family Leave Act may result in employee complaints, regulatory enforcement action and potential legal claims. The legislation provides for penalties ranging from USD 2,000 for a first violation to USD 5,000 for a second and each subsequent violation, in addition to any other remedies available under the law.
Link N/A
New York City – Protected Time Off Law
Impact date: 23 July 2026
New York City's Earned Safe and Sick Time Act (ESSTA) has been amended to require employers to make at least 32 hours of protected leave available to employees immediately upon their first day of employment and at the start of each calendar year. This entitlement applies equally to full-time, part-time and mid-year hires and is separate from any additional paid leave that employers may already be required to provide under applicable laws or workplace policies.
The amendments also provide that if an employee leaves employment and is subsequently rehired by the same employer during the same calendar year, the employer must reinstate any unused portion of the employee's immediately available 32-hour leave entitlement.
Guidance issued in relation to the amendments indicates that, in certain circumstances, employers may still be required to pay exempt employees (employees who are generally not entitled to overtime pay under US wage and hour laws) when they take unpaid protected leave. In addition, employers that provide ESSTA notices and information electronically are required to retain certain records relating to employees' use of unpaid leave for up to six months following the end of employment.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with employees in New York City should review and update their safe and sick leave policies, employee handbooks and leave-management procedures to ensure compliance with the new requirements. Employers should also implement appropriate systems to track the availability and use of the new protected leave entitlement, retain required records and ensure that the rules are applied correctly to both exempt and non-exempt employees.
Employer risk Failure to comply with the amended requirements may result in employee complaints, regulatory investigations and legal claims. Employers may also face financial liability for non-compliance, including penalties, compensation orders and other remedies available under the legislation.
Link N/A
Maine – Salary transparency
Impact date: 29 July 2026
Employers with 10 or more employees in Maine are now required to include a pay range in job advertisements. For these purposes, a pay range may be based on:
- An existing pay scale for the position.
- A previously established wage range for the position.
- The actual pay range of employees currently performing equivalent roles.
- The amount budgeted for the position.
For positions that are compensated entirely through commission, employers must disclose the applicable compensation structure in the job advertisement.
The legislation also provides employees with a right to request information about compensation. Upon request, an employer must disclose the pay range for the position currently held by the employee.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with operations in Maine should review their recruitment processes, job advertisement templates and compensation records to ensure compliance with the new pay transparency requirements. Employers should also maintain clear and up-to-date pay ranges for positions and establish procedures for responding to employee requests for pay range information.
Employer risk Failure to comply with the legislation may result in financial penalties of USD 100 to USD 500 per violation. Employers may also face regulatory scrutiny, employee complaints and reputational risks associated with non-compliance with pay transparency obligations.
Link N/A
Florida – Minimum wage increase
Impact date: 30 September 2026
Florida's statewide minimum wage will increase from USD 14.00 per hour to USD 15.00 per hour on 30 September 2026.
This increase affects the minimum hourly rate that must be paid to eligible employees. However, it does not change the salary threshold used to determine whether certain employees are exempt from overtime and other wage and hour requirements under US federal law. That threshold remains USD 684 per week under the current federal rules.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with employees in Florida should review pay rates for all non-exempt employees to ensure compliance with the increased minimum wage from 30 September 2026. Employers should also update payroll systems, budgeting assumptions and any wage-related policies or communications to reflect the new rate.
Employer risk Failure to comply with minimum wage requirements may result in employee claims, government enforcement action and liability for unpaid wages. Employers may also be required to pay additional compensation, including liquidated damages (an additional amount equal to the unpaid wages), as well as interest, penalties and legal costs.
Link N/A
Connecticut –Artificial intelligence in hiring and employment decisions
Impact date: 1 October 2026 Connecticut has introduced new requirements for employers that use artificial intelligence (AI) in recruitment, hiring and other employment-related decision-making processes. The legislation applies where AI is used to assist with or automate decisions relating to applicants or employees.
Under the new law, employers must provide certain disclosures to applicants and employees when AI is used in connection with employment decisions affecting them. The legislation is also intended to reinforce existing anti-discrimination protections by making clear that an employer cannot rely on the use of AI as a defence to a discrimination claim. In other words, employers remain responsible for employment decisions made with the assistance of AI systems and may still be liable if those systems produce discriminatory outcomes.
Employer implications/action needed Employers using AI tools in recruitment, hiring, promotion, performance management or other employment-related decisions should review their practices to ensure compliance with the new disclosure requirements. Employers should also assess the risks associated with any AI systems they use, including whether those systems could have a discriminatory impact on applicants or employees, and implement appropriate governance, monitoring and compliance measures.
Employer risk Employers may face discrimination claims, regulatory investigations and potential financial liability if AI-assisted employment decisions unlawfully disadvantage individuals based on a protected characteristic, such as race, sex, age, disability or another legally protected status. The legislation makes clear that the use of an automated decision-making system does not remove or reduce an employer's responsibility for complying with anti-discrimination laws.
Link N/A
New York – Trapped at Work Act
Impact date: 19 December 2026 (delayed effective date).
New York’s Trapped at Work Act (“Act”) prohibits agreements entered into as a condition of employment that require workers to repay money if they leave employment before a stated period of time. Under the Act, employers may not require, as a condition of employment, any “employment promissory note” or agreement that (i) requires payment to the employer if the worker leaves before a specified time, or (ii) labels repayment as reimbursement for employer-provided training.
The Act defines the term “employer” broadly to include subsidiaries and any entity that provides training to workers. Additionally, the term “worker” includes employees, independent contractors, interns and externs, volunteers, apprentices, and sole proprietors providing services. The term does not include individuals “whose sole relationship with the employer is as a vendor of goods.”
On 13 February 2026, amendments to the Act were signed into law, providing for a delayed effective date, exception for common compensation arrangements, a standalone exception for tuition repayments, a narrower definition of covered workers as “employees”, and still no private right of actions for employees to sue employer for violation.
Employer implications/action needed Employers should consider evaluating their bonus and other repayment agreements under this Act and consider revisions to their current agreements and templates.
Employer risk In the event of non-compliance, employers can face civil penalties from the New York State Department of Labor, ranging from $1,000 to $5,000 for each violation.
Link N/A
Connecticut – Americans with Disabilities Act Reasonable Accommodations Notice
Impact date: On or before 29 January 2027
The Connecticut law takes effect on 1 October 2026, and requires that, by 29 January 2027, employers in Connecticut with 15 or more employees in the US must provide written notice to new hires and current employees of their right to reasonable accommodation(s) in the workplace for a qualifying disability. Posters that satisfy this requirement should be available through each state’s Labor Commissioner and would need to be hung in a conspicuous location that is accessible to employees. While employers subject to the ADA have always had the requirement to notify employees that they may request an accommodation for a qualifying disability, the written notice is a new requirement under Connecticut law. Further, if a poster is not used, and if an employee discloses a qualifying disability to their employer, the employer must provide the Reasonable Accommodation Notice within 10 days of the notification.
Employer implications/action needed Employers should draft appropriate notices and/or hang posters.
Employer risk Back pay, lost benefits, and general enforcement actions are among the possible damages and penalties.
Link N/A
Washington State – Non-compete agreements
Impact date: 30 June 2027 (effective date); 1 October 2027 (notice date)
Non-compete agreements in employment will be largely prohibited, even among high-wage earners. Subject to limited exceptions, non-compete agreements will become void and unenforceable for all businesses and employees from 30 June 2027.
The legislation also broadens the definition of a “noncompetition covenant”. In addition to traditional restrictions on working for a competitor, the definition now includes certain provisions affecting performers and contractual terms that require an individual to return, repay or forfeit compensation, benefits or other rights as a consequence of engaging in a lawful profession, trade or business. The legislation does not prohibit non-solicitation agreements (agreements that restrict a former worker from soliciting clients, customers or employees). However, it provides that such restrictions must be interpreted narrowly and includes additional guidance on who may be regarded as a prospective client for these purposes.
Employers will also be required to take steps in relation to existing agreements. By 1 October 2027, employers must provide written notice to current and former employees and independent contractors informing them that any non-compete provisions that are no longer enforceable under the legislation are unenforceable.
Employer implications/action needed Employers that currently use non-compete agreements with employees or independent contractors should review those arrangements well in advance of the implementation date. Employers may wish to consider alternative methods of protecting confidential information, trade secrets and customer relationships, such as confidentiality agreements, intellectual property protections and appropriately drafted non-solicitation provisions. Employers should also prepare the required notices and review existing template agreements to identify provisions that may be affected by the expanded definition of a non-compete agreement.
Employer risk Employers that continue to rely on non-compliant non-compete provisions after the legislation takes effect may face legal challenges and potential civil liability. Failure to provide the required notices or to amend affected agreements may also expose employers to enforcement action and litigation.
Link N/A
California – Paid family leave extended to cover leave for designated persons
Impact date: 1 July 2027 Senate Bill (SB) 590 expands the eligibility of benefits under the state paid family leave program to include individuals who take time off to care for a seriously ill designated person. Starting on 1 July 2028, benefits under the state-paid family leave program will be available to employees caring for a designated person. SB 590 specifically codifies and defines a “designated person”, defining it to mean any individual related by blood or whose association with the employee is the equivalent of a family relationship.
When requesting family temporary disability insurance benefits to care for a designated person, the worker must both identify the individual and attest under penalty of perjury to the nature of the relationship, including either how the designated person is related by blood or how the worker’s association with the designated person is the equivalent of a family relationship.
Employers may still limit employees to one designated person per 12-month period, and paid family leave benefits remain limited to eight weeks with any 12-month period.
Employer implications/action needed Employers should review and update handbooks regarding protected paid sick leave and paid family leave. HR and managers should receive training and guidance that a “designated person” does not require a familial or domestic relationship and to ensure that confidentiality around medical certification extends to designated persons.
Employer risk Employers face increased exposure to claims if they improperly deny leave, misinterpret or narrowly define a “designated person,” or request unlawful documentation beyond the employee’s attestation. There is also heightened risk of discrimination or retaliation claims if employees allege they were treated unfavorably after taking leave for a designated person.
Link N/A
Delaware – Pay transparency law
Impact date: 1 September 2027 Delaware signed House Bill (H.B.) 105 into law, which requires employers with 26 or more employees to include certain compensation and benefit information in job postings. The Bill requires covered employers who announce, post or make known a job opportunity to disclose the “hourly or salary compensation range and a general description of the benefits and other compensation.” The law defines the “hourly or salary compensation range” as “the minimum to maximum pay range for the position, set in good faith by reference to any applicable pay scale, previously determined range for the position, the actual range of others currently holding equivalent positions, or the budgeted amount for the position, as applicable.”
The disclosure requirement applies to both internal and external job postings. If a posting for the job opportunity has not been made available to an applicant, the employer must provide the required compensation and benefit information “prior to any offer or discussion of compensation and at any time at the applicant’s request.”
The law applies to employers with 26 or more employees and covers jobs located in Delaware and non-international remote positions offered by Delaware-based employers. The law does not explicitly state whether the 26-employee minimum includes only employees located in Delaware or also those outside of Delaware.
Employer implications/action needed Employers must make, keep and preserve records of job descriptions and the salary and wage rate history of each employee for at least three years and make such records available to the US Department of Labor (DOL) upon request.
Employer risk The law has an anti-retaliation provision and provides for a civil penalty of not less than $500 and no more than $10,000 for each such discharge or act of retaliation. An employer’s failure to comply with the law’s disclosure requirements for one job opportunity is considered one violation, regardless of the number of times the job opportunity is posted.
Link N/A
Maryland – Paid family leave
Impact date: Employees may become eligible for benefits as of 3 January 2028
As of 1 January 2025, delays to contributions and benefits under the Maryland Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance Program have been agreed. Contributions to the program will begin in January 2027 and benefits will be available beginning on 3 January 2028.
The Maryland Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance Program applies to all employers with at least one employee. Employees who have worked at least 680 hours over the four most recent quarters are eligible for up to 12 weeks of leave for the birth, adoption, or foster care placement of a new child, or to care their own medical condition or that of a family member, as defined in the statute. An additional 12 weeks may be available to care for the employees own serious medical condition or that of a family member if the initial 12 weeks was for the birth, adoption, or foster care placement of a child. Employees can receive up to 90% of their salary with a maximum of $1,000 per week funded by employer and employee contributions.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with one or more employees in Maryland should update policies and practices to comply.
Employer risk Employers can be liable for penalties up to $1,000 per violation as well as lost wages and benefits and treble damages.
Link N/A
Virginia – Heat illness prevention requirements
Impact date: The Safety and Health Codes Board will develop and adopt heat illness prevention regulations no later than 1 May 2028
Virginia enacted legislation requiring the development of workplace heat illness prevention standards. The legislation applies to employers whose workers may be exposed to heat-related risks and is intended to improve protections for both employees and independent contractors working in hot conditions.
The legislation requires the Virginia Safety and Health Codes Board to develop regulations addressing heat-related workplace hazards. At a minimum, the future regulations must require employers to:
- Provide access to drinking water, shade or climate-controlled environments where practicable.
- Allow appropriate rest breaks and measures to help workers acclimatize to working in hot conditions.
- Provide effective training on heat illness prevention.
- Implement additional safety measures when workplace temperatures reach specified heat or high-heat thresholds.
- Establish effective emergency response procedures for heat-related incidents.
Employer implications/action needed Although the detailed regulations are still being developed, employers should begin reviewing their existing health and safety arrangements for employees and independent contractors who work in hot environments. Employers may wish to develop heat illness prevention programmes, assess workplace heat risks, review emergency response procedures and consider whether additional training, hydration, rest-break and cooling measures may be required once the new regulations are introduced.
Employer risk Once the regulations are implemented, employers that fail to comply may face regulatory enforcement action and increased exposure to claims arising from heat-related illnesses or injuries. Employers may also face operational disruption if appropriate heat-risk management measures are not in place.
Link N/A
Contacts

© Eversheds Sutherland. All rights reserved. Eversheds Sutherland is a global provider of legal and other services operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. Eversheds Sutherland is the name and brand under which the members of Eversheds Sutherland Limited (Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP and Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP) and their respective controlled, managed and affiliated firms and the members of Eversheds Sutherland (Europe) Limited (each an "Eversheds Sutherland Entity" and together the "Eversheds Sutherland Entities") provide legal or other services to clients around the world. Eversheds Sutherland Entities are constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local regulatory and legal requirements and operate in accordance with their locally registered names. The use of the name Eversheds Sutherland, is for description purposes only and does not imply that the Eversheds Sutherland Entities are in a partnership or are part of a global LLP. The responsibility for the provision of services to the client is defined in the terms of engagement between the instructed firm and the client.
Connect with us





