USA
Oklahoma – Data breach notification
Impact date: 1 January 2026
A new law (S.B. 626) broadens the definition of “personal information” to include electronic identifiers, biometric data and other unique identification issued by government entities. Personal information does not include data that has been altered to be unreadable.
The law provides for potential civil penalties based on the extent of the breach and behavior of the entity contributing to the breach. However, employers that use “reasonable safeguards” to prevent data breaches are not subject to civil penalties. In turn, reasonable safeguard is defined as “policies and practices that ensure personal information is secure, taking into consideration an entity’s size and the type and amount of personal information. . . [including] conducting risk assessments, implementing technical and physical layered defenses, employee training on handling personal information, and establishing an incident response plan .”.
Even if employers fail to maintain reasonable safeguards, they may still limit their exposure to civil penalties if they adhere to the law’s notice requirement (though they may still be exposed to actual damages).
Entities found in breach of the disclosure limitation must provide notice to the state AG no later than 60 days after providing notice to impacted individuals. This notice must include the date of breach, the date of determination, the nature and type of breach, the number of affected people, and the estimated financial effects of the breach. However, breaches involving 500 or more residents of Oklahoma are exempt from this notice requirement. Additionally, certain employers, such as financial institutions complying with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (as well as applicable federal notice requirements) are deemed to be in compliance with the Act’s notice requirement if they notify the AG of a breach.
Employer implications/action needed Employers should revise their information storage and disclosure policies and implement reasonable safeguards against the unintended breach of unique identification information. Further, employers should implement a notice policy and train HR staff on their notice obligation (depending on employee count).
Employer risk Potential civil penalties for data breaches caused by the employer and for which the employer did not maintain reasonable safeguards.
Link N/A
Oregon – Paid sick leave
Impact date: 1 January 2026
A new law (S.B. 1108) amends the paid family leave statute to allow paid sick leave for blood donation made in connection with a voluntary program. Such donations must be approved or accredited by the American Association of Blood Banks or the Red Cross.
Employer implications/action needed The law does not include a notice requirement, but employers may want to review their policies.
Employer risk Ensure employees are permitted to use sick leave for this purpose.
Link N/A
Texas – Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act
Impact date: 1 January 2026
On 22 June 2025, Texas enacted the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act. This Act contains broad limitations on the use of AI both within and outside of the workplace. In the workplace, the use of AI may not be used to discriminate against protected classes under Texas law or federal law. Certain carve-outs are made for insurance companies and financial institutions that are governed by other applicable non-discrimination laws.
Under the new law, AI systems is broadly defined as “any machine-based system that, for any explicit or implicit objective, infers from the inputs the system receives how to generate outputs, including content, decisions, predictions, or recommendations, that can influence physical or virtual environments.”
Regulatory Sandbox Program: The Act creates a “Sandbox Program” for entities and employers interested in testing their AI systems. Doing so allows employers to “obtain legal protection and limited access to the market in [Texas] to test [their systems] without obtaining license, registration, or other regulatory authorization.”
Employer implications/action needed Employers should review use of AI in the workplace and the restrictions and options under this law.
Employer risk Although there is no private right of action, the Act provides that the attorney general may seek civil penalties ranging between $10,000 and $12,000 for curable violations and penalties between $80,000 and $200,000 for uncurable violations of the Act. Additionally, the Texas Attorney General may seek injunctive relief and may request attorney’s fees and reasonable court costs related to an action in the name of the State.
Link N/A
Washington State – Paid family and medical leave
Impact date: 1 January 2026 (for employers with 25 or more employees); H.B. 2345 becomes effective 11 June 2026.
The scope of Washington’s paid family and medical leave (PFML) program was increased to include employers with as few as eight employees.
Under this law:
- employers with 25 or more employees must provide PFML benefits from 1 January 2026
- employers with 15 or more employees must provide PFML benefits from 1 January 2027
- employers with 8 or more employees must provide PFML benefits from 1 January 2028
Employees may forfeit their rights to PFML benefits if they do not elect to receive benefits before the earlier of the first scheduled workday following the period of leave for federal benefits or the first scheduled workday following a continuous or combined period of 16 weeks of leave during 52 consecutive weeks.
H.B. 2345: Washington has revised its state paid family leave program to shift the employer’s share of contributions relating to family and medical leave. Under the new law, employers may deduct from employee wages contributions to the medical leave premiums in accordance with the terms of the law.
Employer implications/action needed Employers are advised to review their processes for compliance with this program.
Employer risk Potential additional tax implications.
Link N/A
Delaware – Paid family medical leave
Impact date: 1 January 2026 Employees who perform at least 60% of their work for their employer in Delaware, and who have worked for their employer for at least one year and 1,250 hours, are eligible for time off and benefits under the Delaware Healthy Families Act.
Employers with ten-24 employees need only allow time off for parental leave, but employers with 25+ employees must allow time off for parental, family care giving, and medical leave. Leave time is up to 12 weeks per year for parental leave, and up to six weeks per 24-month period to care for their own medical condition or that of a family member, as defined in the statute. Employees can receive up to 80% of their salary with a maximum of $900 per week (in 2026, 2027) funded by employer contributions, but employers can deduct up to 50% of the contribution from employee wages.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with ten or more employees in Delaware should update policies and practices to comply.
Employer risk Employers can be liable for penalties up to $5,000 per violation as well as lost wages and benefits.
Link N/A
Illinois – Expanded dependent coverage requirements for fully insured health plans
Impact date: 1 January 2026 Fully insured health plans in Illinois must extend coverage to eligible dependent parents and stepparents of insured individuals, provided they reside within the health plan’s service area.
A parent or stepparent must be a “qualifying relative” ,i.e., be a parent/stepparent, have gross income less than the exemption amount ($5,050), and receive more than half of the individual’s total financial support.
This development applies to health insurance policies issued, amended, delivered or renewed in Illinois after 1 January 2026. It does not apply to policies issued in other states, even if the employer has employees living or working in Illinois.
Self-funded and level funded plans are excluded.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with fully insured health plans in Illinois should coordinate with their carriers on enrollment processes for dependent parents and stepparents, and determine an appropriate administrative approach (i.e., requiring an attestation form or affidavit from an employee prior to enrolling a dependent parent or stepparent onto the plan).
Employer risk N/A
Link N/A
California – Prohibition against workers contracting to repay debts
Impact date: 1 January 2026 Applicable to contracts entered into on or after 1 January 2026, an amendment to the law makes it unlawful to include in any employment contract or require a worker to execute, as a condition of employment, a contract that includes a term that require a worker to “pay an employer, training provider, or debt collector for a debt if the worker’s employment or work relationship with a specific employer terminates”, with limited exceptions. If the employment relationship ends, it is unlawful to include terms that impose penalties or fees, or require employees to pay debts or authorize debt collection.
There are some allowances for contracts for repayment under the law:
- a contract entered under a loan repayment assistance program or loan forgiveness program provided by a federal, state, or local government agency
- a contract related to the repayment of the cost of tuition for a transferable credential, provided that the contract meets certain guidelines
- a contract related to enrolment in an apprenticeship program provided by the Division of Apprenticeship Standards
- a contract for the receipt of a discretionary or unearned monetary payment at the outset of employment, including a financial bonus, not tied to specific job performance, provided that the contract meets certain guidelines
- a contract related to the lease, financing, or purchase of residential property
Employer implications/action needed The law applies to all employers in California. Employers should review terms of contract templates and bonus arrangements.
Employer risk The law allows for private rights of action, including minimum damages of $5,000 per worker, injunctive relief, and attorney’s fees and costs.
Link N/A
California – Minimum wage increase
Impact date: 1 January 2026 California’s minimum wage has increased to $16.90 per hour from $16.50 per hour.
Many California cities and counties require an hourly local minimum wage that is higher than the State’s for non-exempt employees performing work within their geographical boundaries. This means that local minimum wage requirements apply based on where employees are physically working, and not where the employer’s office or headquarters are located. The State minimum wage increase automatically increases the minimum salary requirement for white collar exempt employees to $70,304 (annualized).
Employees in the fast food and health care industries have higher minimum wages.
Employer implications/action needed Employers should ensure that their 2026 wage rates keep up with State and local minimum wage changes and check for local minimum wage increases in the location where their non-exempt employees are actually performing their duties.
Employer risk Non-compliance risks repayment of unpaid wages, penalties and interest.
Link N/A
California – Expanded pay data reporting standards
Impact date: Effective 1 January 2026 (demographic information storage) and 1 January 2027 (expanded job categories) California’s Senate Bill (SB 464) enhances existing pay reporting requirements to address wage disparities. It introduces strict changes for private employers, effective in 2026 and 2027, including stricter penalties and reporting on new job categories. Private employers with 100 or more employees must submit annual pay data reports to the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) for a “snapshot” period of the “Reporting Year”. The reports cover:
- employee counts by race, ethnicity, and sex across ten job categories
- employee earnings within the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics pay bands, including hours worked
- mean and median hourly pay rates by race, ethnicity, and sex
Starting in 2026. Penalties will become mandatory upon CRD requests. Additionally, SB 464 requires that employers store demographic data separately from personnel records. In 2027, the ten job categories expand to 23, based on the Standard Occupational Classification System.
Employer implications/action needed Employers should start coordinating with vendors to ensure complete data for the 12 May 2026 deadline, begin evaluating roles for reassignment into the 23 categories for the 2027 reporting cycle, and align reassignment with any other reporting that may be impacted.
Employer risk Non-compliance risks penalties of $100 per employee ($200 for repeats), at the court’s discretion.
Link N/A
California – Expands CalWARN notice requirements
Impact date: Effective 1 January 2026. California signed Senate Bill (SB) 617, which expands the information employers are required to include under the California Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (CalWARN).
CalWARN requires employers to give advance notice of certain mass layoffs, plant closures, or relocations. CalWARN is stricter than federal WARN. It covers employers with 75 employees, including part-time staff. CalWARN also triggers notice obligations for a wider range of events: it requires 60 days’ advance notice for any plant closures, layoffs of 50 or more employees, regardless of workforce percentage, and relocations of at least 100 miles affecting any number of employees. Additionally, CalWARN mandates notice to more local entities, including the local workforce development board (LWDB) and city and county officials.
Under this Bill, employers are required to state whether they plan to coordinate services for affected employees through the LWDB, another entity, or not at all. Employers must provide the LWDB’s contact information (email and phone number) and a description of its services in the notice, regardless of its choice. The notice must also include the following required statement:
“Local Workforce Development Boards and their partners help laid off workers find new jobs. Visit an America’s Job Center of California location near you. You can get help with your resume, practice interviewing, search for jobs, and more. You can also learn about training programs to help start a new career.”
Employer implications/action needed Employers must provide their own contact information. Each notice must include a functioning employer email and telephone number for employees and agencies to contact. Employers need to identify the LWDB and plan any “rapid response” within 30 days.
Employer risk Failure to comply can result in back-pay liability and civil penalties.
Link N/A
Pennsylvania and Philadelphia – Fair Criminal Record Screening Standards Ordinance
Impact date: Effective 6 January 2026 On 8 October 2025, the Mayor of Philadelphia signed amendments to the city’s Fair Criminal Record Screening Standards Ordinance (the Fair Chance law) into law.
Under the amendments, employers may consider misdemeanor convictions in their employment decisions if the crime occurred within the past four years, instead of the previous seven-year standard. Employers may still consider felony convictions occurring within the past seven years, but they are not permitted to consider an applicant’s or employee’s summary offenses.
Additionally, employers are also prohibited from considering expunged or sealed criminal convictions, even if those convictions appear on a criminal background check. The amendments clarify that criminal history inquiries, as restricted by the Fair Chance law, include an employer’s “inquiry” into an applicant’s criminal history using any search of public or government records or the internet, whether conducted by the employer or a third-party. Employers are still required to conduct an individualized assessment of six factors before rejecting an applicant or employee from a job based on criminal conviction history.
Lastly, the amendments impose new obligations on employers during the decision-making process, requiring that they provide a pre-decision notice of their intent to reject an applicant for a job opening due to their criminal history. The employer must notify the employee in writing of certain outlined conditions and appeal rights.
Employer implications/action needed Employers in Philadelphia should review their policies and procedures, including job advertisements, applications, and other hiring forms, to ensure they are compliant with all applicable mandates. Employers should also consider training personnel involved in the hiring process about applicable laws.
Employer risk Possible litigation.
Link N/A
Pennsylvania – Prohibition on discrimination based on traits and hairstyle
Impact date: 24 January 2026
The CROWN Act was enacted in November 2025 and amends the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act to prohibit employment discrimination on the basis of an employee’s “traits historically associated with the individual’s race, including hair texture and protective hairstyles.” The law also addresses potential discrimination regarding head coverings and hairstyles associated with an individual’s religious creed.
Employers may still maintain valid health and safety policies regarding these head coverings if the policies are adopted for non-discriminatory reasons, specifically tailored to a given activity, applied equally and is required for the health or safety of the employee. The law provides guidelines for implementing other workplace policies and health and safety rules that may have a bearing on hairstyles and textures provided they meet the protective factors outlined in the revised statute.
Employer implications/action needed Employers are advised to review their health and safety guidelines and workplace policies to comply.
Employer risk N/A
Link N/A
California – Workplace Know Your Rights Act
Impact date: 1 February 2026 Employers are required to deliver a standalone “Know Your Rights” notice to current employees on an annual basis and to new employees upon hire, using the Labor Commissioner’s template. The new law also requires employers to give all current employees the opportunity to designate an emergency contact by 30 March 2026 and to collect this information at hire thereafter.
The notice, required to have been distributed by 1 February 2026, must cover, among other topics:
- worker compensation benefits and contract information for the Division of Worker’s Compensation
- employee rights regarding immigration agency inspections and protections against unfair immigration-related practices
- employee rights to organize or engage in concerted activity
- a summary of constitutional rights when interacting with law enforcement at work
- any other material developments and enforcement agencies identified by the Labor Commissioner
Employer implications/action needed Employers must deliver the notice in the language that is ordinarily used to communicate with employees if the template is unavailable in that language. Employers may deliver the notice through the usual communication methods if it can reasonably be expected to reach the employee within one business day. Employers must keep records for a three-year period, beginning as of the date each notice was provided or sent.
Employer risk A penalty of $500 per employee per violation. The penalty for a violation of the emergency contact provision is an amount up to $500 per employee for each day the violation occurs, up to a maximum of $10,000 per employee.
Link N/A
New York – Earned Safe and Sick Time Act (ESSTA) amendment
Impact date: 22 February 2026 Amendments to the New York City earned Safe and Sick Time Act (ESSTA) expand employees’ rights and increase employers’ safe and sick time compliance obligations, but scale back employers’ obligations relating to temporary schedule changes.
The ESSTA currently requires employers to provide safe and sick time to employees working in New York City for statutorily defined reasons:
- employers with 100 or more employees must provide up to 56 hours of paid sick/safe leave each year
- employers with five to 99 employees or employers with four or fewer employees and a net income of $1,000,000 or more must provide up to 40 hours of paid sick/safe leave each year
- employers with four or fewer employees and a net income of less than $1,000,000 must provide up to 40 hours of unpaid sick/safe leave each year
This must be provided to employees immediately, and there is no waiting period for use.
Employers may impose a minimum usage increment of up to four hours per day and must separately track and report both paid and unpaid time balances to comply with ESSTA’s notice and recordkeeping requirements. The amendments also broaden the qualifying reasons for using safe and sick time under ESSTA to caregiving, pursuit of subsistence benefits or housing, and workplace violence and qualifying public disasters.
The amendments also formally incorporate the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection’s rule aligning ESSTA with New York State’s paid prenatal leave requirements.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with employees working in New York City should review and update their policies and practices to ensure compliance with the new requirements. ESSTA requires employers to maintain a written policy with specific minimum information related to ESSTA leave.
Employer risk Non-compliance risks potential lawsuits or claims by employees.
Link N/A
Maine – Paid family medical leave
Impact date: Employees become eligible for benefits as of 1 May 2026 (subject to possible delays). Contributions to the Maine Paid Family and Medical Leave Program began on 1 January 2025. Employees are eligible for benefits as of 1 May 2026.
Employees who earn at least six times the State’s Average Weekly Wage (SAWW) during the base period are eligible to take up to 12 weeks of leave for the birth, adoption, or foster care placement of a new child; to care for their own or a family member’s serious health condition; organ donation; for specified purposes related to domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking; or the death or serious health condition of certain family members on active military duty.
The Program applies to all employers. Employees can receive up to 100% of the SAWW, which is currently $1,198.84, funded by employer contributions, but employers can deduct up to 50% of the contribution from employee wages.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with employees in Maine should review policies and practices to comply.
Employer risk Employers can be liable for penalties and damages.
Link N/A
Illinois – Neonatal intensive care leave
Impact date: 1 June 2026 Under the Neonatal Intensive Care Leave Act (NICLA), when the child of an employee is a patient in a neonatal intensive care unit, Illinois employers must provide:
- ten days of unpaid leave (employers with 16-49 employees)
- 20 days of unpaid leave (employers with 50+ employees)
Leave may be taken intermittently or consecutively, is in addition to FMLA leave and is tacked on at the end of FMLA leave. Employers may not require employees to substitute accrued paid leave prior to taking NICLA leave, and employees must be reinstated to their former position or a substantially equivalent position with no loss of benefits held or accrued prior to taking leave.
Employers may require “reasonable verification” of the child’s NICU stay but cannot request any confidential information protected by HIPAA or any other law.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with 16 or more employees in Illinois should note the new requirements and take steps to update their leave policies accordingly.
Employer risk The IDOL can impose penalties up to $5,000 per violation and can assess other damages such as unpaid wages and further penalties, with 80% of the amount collected going to the employee. Employees have 60 days from the last event constituting the alleged violation (e.g., not returning employee to prior/similar position, retaliating at a later date, or forcing employee to use paid leave) to file a claim with the IDOL or a lawsuit in court.
Link N/A
New York – Trapped at Work Act
Impact date: The Amended Act has delayed the effective date to 19 December 2026. New York’s Trapped at Work Act (“Act”) prohibits agreements entered into as a condition of employment, that require workers to repay money if they leave employment before a stated period of time. Under the Act, employers may not require, as a condition of employment, any “employment promissory note” or agreement that (i) requires payment to the employer if the worker leaves before a specified time, or (ii) labels repayment as reimbursement for employer-provided training.
The Act defines the term “employer” broadly to include subsidiaries and any entity that provides training to workers. Additionally, the term “worker” includes employees, independent contractors, interns and externs, volunteers, apprentices, and sole proprietors providing services. The term does not include individuals “whose sole relationship with the employer is as a vendor of goods.”
On 13 February 2026, amendments to the Act were signed into law, providing for a delayed effective date, exception for common compensation arrangements, a standalone exception for tuition repayments, a narrower definition of covered workers as “employees”, and still no private right of actions for employees to sue employer for violation.
Employer implications/action needed Employers should consider evaluating their bonus and other repayment agreements under this Act and consider revisions to their current agreements and templates.
Employer risk In the event of non-compliance, employers can face civil penalties from the New York State Department of Labor, ranging from $1,000 to $5,000 for each violation.
Link N/A
Washington State – Non-compete agreements
Impact date: 30 June 2027 (Effective Date); 1 October 2027 (Notice Date)
In accordance with a new Bill (H.B. 1155), non-compete agreements in employment will be prohibited, even among high-wage earners. With limited exception, non-compete agreements will become void and unenforceable for all businesses and employees starting on 30 June 2027. The Bill broadens the definition of “noncompetition covenant” to encompass agreements with respect to performers, and an agreement that “threatens, demands, requires, or otherwise effectuates that an individual return, repay, or forfeit any right, benefit, or compensation, as a consequence of the individual engaging in a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind.” By 1 October 2027, employers will be required to provide written notice to current and former employees and independent contractors of unenforceability of any such provisions in existing employment agreements with them.
The Bill does not prohibit non-solicitation agreements but amends the law to require that these provisions be “narrowly construed” and provides insight as to who is a prospective client.
Employer implications/action needed Employers that currently maintain noncompetition agreements with their employees or independent contractors should consider alternative protections for confidential information. Appropriate notices will need to be prepared.
Employer risk Potential exposure to civil action for failure to rescind current non-compete agreements in accordance with the law.
Link N/A
California – Paid family leave extended to cover leave for designated persons
Impact date: 1 July 2027 Senate Bill (SB) 590 expands the eligibility of benefits under the state paid family leave program to include individuals who take time off to care for a seriously ill designated person. Starting on 1 July 2028, benefits under the state-paid family leave program will be available to employees caring for a designated person. SB 590 specifically codifies and defines a “designated person”, defining it to mean any individual related by blood or whose association with the employee is the equivalent of a family relationship.
When requesting family temporary disability insurance benefits to care for a designated person, the worker must both identify the individual and attest under penalty of perjury to the nature of the relationship, including either how the designated person is related by blood or how the worker’s association with the designated person is the equivalent of a family relationship.
Employers may still limit employees to one designated person per 12-month period, and paid family leave benefits remain limited to eight weeks with any 12-month period.
Employer implications/action needed Employers should review and update handbooks regarding protected paid sick leave and paid family leave. HR and managers should receive training and guidance that a “designated person” does not require a familial or domestic relationship and to ensure that confidentiality around medical certification extends to designated persons.
Employer risk Employers face increased exposure to claims if they improperly deny leave, misinterpret or narrowly define a “designated person,” or request unlawful documentation beyond the employee’s attestation. There is also heightened risk of discrimination or retaliation claims if employees allege they were treated unfavorably after taking leave for a designated person.
Link N/A
Delaware – Pay transparency law
Impact date: 1 September 2027 Delaware signed House Bill (H.B.) 105 into law, which requires employers with 26 or more employees to include certain compensation and benefit information in job postings. The Bill requires covered employers who announce, post or make known a job opportunity to disclose the “hourly or salary compensation range and a general description of the benefits and other compensation.” The law defines the “hourly or salary compensation range” as “the minimum to maximum pay range for the position, set in good faith by reference to any applicable pay scale, previously determined range for the position, the actual range of others currently holding equivalent positions, or the budgeted amount for the position, as applicable.”
The disclosure requirement applies to both internal and external job postings. If a posting for the job opportunity has not been made available to an applicant, the employer must provide the required compensation and benefit information “prior to any offer or discussion of compensation and at any time at the applicant’s request.”
The law applies to employers with 26 or more employees and covers jobs located in Delaware and non-international remote positions offered by Delaware-based employers. The law does not explicitly state whether the 26-employee minimum includes only employees located in Delaware or also those outside of Delaware.
Employer implications/action needed Employers must make, keep and preserve records of job descriptions and the salary and wage rate history of each employee for at least three years and make such records available to the US Department of Labor (DOL) upon request.
Employer risk The law has an anti-retaliation provision and provides for a civil penalty of not less than $500 and no more than $10,000 for each such discharge or act of retaliation. An employer’s failure to comply with the law’s disclosure requirements for one job opportunity is considered one violation, regardless of the number of times the job opportunity is posted.
Link N/A
Maryland – Paid family leave
Impact date: Employees may become eligible for benefits as of 3 January 2028
As of 1 January 2025, delays to contributions and benefits under the Maryland Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance Program have been agreed. Contributions to the program will begin in January 2027 and benefits will be available beginning on 3 January 2028.
The Maryland Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance Program applies to all employers with at least one employee. Employees who have worked at least 680 hours over the four most recent quarters are eligible for up to 12 weeks of leave for the birth, adoption, or foster care placement of a new child, or to care their own medical condition or that of a family member, as defined in the statute. An additional 12 weeks may be available to care for the employees own serious medical condition or that of a family member if the initial 12 weeks was for the birth, adoption, or foster care placement of a child. Employees can receive up to 90% of their salary with a maximum of $1,000 per week funded by employer and employee contributions.
Employer implications/action needed Employers with one or more employees in Maryland should update policies and practices to comply.
Employer risk Employers can be liable for penalties up to $1,000 per violation as well as lost wages and benefits and treble damages.
Link N/A
Contact

© Eversheds Sutherland. All rights reserved. Eversheds Sutherland is a global provider of legal and other services operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. Eversheds Sutherland is the name and brand under which the members of Eversheds Sutherland Limited (Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP and Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP) and their respective controlled, managed and affiliated firms and the members of Eversheds Sutherland (Europe) Limited (each an "Eversheds Sutherland Entity" and together the "Eversheds Sutherland Entities") provide legal or other services to clients around the world. Eversheds Sutherland Entities are constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local regulatory and legal requirements and operate in accordance with their locally registered names. The use of the name Eversheds Sutherland, is for description purposes only and does not imply that the Eversheds Sutherland Entities are in a partnership or are part of a global LLP. The responsibility for the provision of services to the client is defined in the terms of engagement between the instructed firm and the client.

