India
What amounts to "stigmatic" language in a service order (case law)
Impact date: 28 April 2026 (judgment) In Sadachari Singh Tomar v Union of India, the Supreme Court upheld the curtailment of an officer's tenure and his reversion to a lower post, holding the order was neither punitive nor stigmatic. Applying Pavanendra Narayan Verma, the court held that for an order to be stigmatic its language must impute something over and above mere unsuitability for the job; the wording used in the appraisal reports here did not cross that threshold. Judicial review of such administrative action is confined to fairness of process, not merits of the decision.
Employer implications/action needed Where ending an engagement or reverting an employee on performance grounds, keep the operative wording neutral and confined to unsuitability, avoiding language that imputes misconduct or moral blame. Ensure appraisals are properly recorded, communicated, and that the employee is given a genuine opportunity to represent against them.
Employer risk Orders worded as misconduct or character imputations risk being treated as punitive, triggering full disciplinary and natural-justice requirements and exposing the action to being set aside.
No punishment on an uncharged ground after the framed charge is defended (case law)
Impact date: 6 May 2026 (judgment) In Dr. Nigam Prakash Narain v National Medical Commission, after a doctor successfully defended the originally framed charge, the regulator punished him on a different, uncharged ground (non-disclosure of prior service) without a fresh notice or hearing. Following Ravi Oraon v. State of Jharkhand, the court held this breached natural justice — once a delinquent defends the framed charge, the authority cannot punish on a completely different charge without a fresh show-cause notice. The court invoked Article 142 and directed the NMC to reduce the penalty to a censure / warning, given an admitted mis-declaration.
Employer implications/action needed In disciplinary proceedings, punish only on charges actually framed and put to the employee; if a new or alternative ground emerges from the inquiry, issue a fresh show-cause notice and grant a hearing before acting on it. Ensure decision-making bodies do not convict on grounds outside the chargesheet.
Employer risk Punishing on an unframed charge renders the penalty liable to be quashed for breach of natural justice; procedural shortcuts expose the entire disciplinary outcome to challenge regardless of underlying merits.
Central Rules under the four Labour Codes notified (Wages, Industrial Relations, Social Security, OSH) — Central sphere
Impact date: 8 May 2026 (Central Rules); principal Codes announced effective 21 November 2025 On 8 May 2026, the Central Government notified the operational Central Rules under all four Labour Codes. These take effect on Gazette publication and set out the required registers, returns, wage slips, contribution mechanics and compliance forms. These Central Rules apply only where the Central Government is the "appropriate Government" under each Code — primarily Central PSUs, Central establishments and enumerated sectors (railways, mines, oilfields, major ports, air transport, banking, insurance, telecom) - with the Code on Social Security additionally extending the Central sphere to establishments operating in more than one State for PF and ESI purposes. The principal Codes were announced to commence on 21 November 2025 per the Ministry's PIB release.
Employer implications/action needed Central-sphere employers should map HR, payroll and compliance processes to the new Central Forms, registers and single registration / single license / single return architecture. State-sphere employers should continue to track corresponding State Rules, which were at varying stages of notification as at 31 May 2026. Update appointment letters (now mandatory) and align wage-structure definitions across payroll, PF, ESI and gratuity.
Employer risk Misidentifying the appropriate Government leads to either over-compliance with the wrong regime or non-compliance with the correct one, both exposing employers to penalties under the relevant Code.
Model Standing Orders, 2026 notified under the IR Code (mining, manufacturing, service sectors)
Impact date: 8 May 2026 (date of publication) New Model Standing Orders were notified under section 29 of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 on 8 May 2026, superseding the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central Rules, 1946. They apply where the Central Government is the appropriate Government under the IR Code (Central establishments and enumerated sectors such as railways, mines, oilfields, major ports, air transport, banking, insurance and telecom) and set out worker classifications including fixed-term employment, probation (six months, extendable by three) and discipline rules across three sector schedules. State-sphere establishments will be governed by State-notified Model Standing Orders (where issued) or by certified Standing Orders.
Employer implications/action needed Central-sphere establishments must decide whether to adopt the Central Model Standing Orders or certify bespoke ones. If adopting, notify the certifying officer electronically of the specific adoption date and display orders in Hindi, English and local language. Reclassify the workforce against the new categories, particularly fixed-term and probationer.
Employer risk Failure to notify the adoption date or to display orders, and misclassification of fixed-term workers, can trigger certifying-officer directions, employee challenges and industrial disputes.
Link Gazette of India — S.O. 2312(E), May 8, 2026 (in Hindi)
Aggregator contribution and gig / platform worker registration framework operationalised under the Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026
Impact date: 8 May 2026 (rules published); contribution start date awaits separate notification The Rules require aggregators to register gig and platform workers via API on the designated portal within 45 days, and to self-assess contribution at 1–2% of annual turnover (capped at 5% of amounts paid to such workers). Provisional contribution falls due by 30 June and a final return in Form-XXI by 31 October each year. The actual commencement date for aggregator contribution remains to be separately notified under section 114(5) of the Code on Social Security, 2020.
Employer implications/action needed Build API integration with the Government portal, register all gig and platform workers (engaged directly or through associate / holding / subsidiary entities or third parties), and set up self-assessment in Forms XX and XXI. Begin sharing worker data within 45 days of the rules' commencement.
Employer risk Late or non-payment attracts interest at 1% per month; non-updating of worker data can disqualify workers from benefits and create enforcement and reputational exposure for aggregators.
Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026 brought into force
Impact date: 25 May 2026 (commencement); assented 30 March 2026 The Amendment Act (No. 3 of 2026), which received Presidential assent on 30 March 2026, was brought into force on 25 May 2026 by Gazette notification S.O. 2620(E) dated 22 May 2026. It redefines "transgender person" (now expressly including specified intersex variations, and excluding persons with different sexual orientations or self-perceived sexual identities), introduces a medical board "authority" for certification, and substitutes section 18 to substantially expand offences — including denial of access to public places, economic abuse, and forced or bonded labour involving transgender persons. Section 7 certification of gender change is tightened, with medical institutions now required to report procedures to the District Magistrate.
Employer implications/action needed Review non-discrimination policies, the section 11 complaint officer mechanism and equal opportunity policies under the principal Act to reflect the revised definition and the new section 18 offences. Audit workplace practices around facility access, treatment of transgender employees and pay / benefit decisions to ensure they could not constitute "economic abuse" or denial of access. Train HR and line managers on the revised offences, which range from six months' imprisonment to life imprisonment depending on the conduct.
Employer risk Workplace conduct amounting to economic abuse, denial of access or facilitation of forced labour involving transgender persons now expressly attracts criminal liability under the substituted section 18, in addition to existing civil discrimination obligations under sections 3, 9, 10 and 11 of the principal Act.
Contact
© Eversheds Sutherland. All rights reserved. Eversheds Sutherland is a global provider of legal and other services operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. Eversheds Sutherland is the name and brand under which the members of Eversheds Sutherland Limited (Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP and Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP) and their respective controlled, managed and affiliated firms and the members of Eversheds Sutherland (Europe) Limited (each an "Eversheds Sutherland Entity" and together the "Eversheds Sutherland Entities") provide legal or other services to clients around the world. Eversheds Sutherland Entities are constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local regulatory and legal requirements and operate in accordance with their locally registered names. The use of the name Eversheds Sutherland, is for description purposes only and does not imply that the Eversheds Sutherland Entities are in a partnership or are part of a global LLP. The responsibility for the provision of services to the client is defined in the terms of engagement between the instructed firm and the client.