Tunisia
In your jurisdiction, are there any formal ADR procedures available for resolving commercial disputes other than litigating (or arbitrating) to a final hearing?
In Tunisia, there are formal alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures available for resolving commercial disputes, without going through full litigation or arbitration (Tunisia has a well-established framework for commercial arbitration, and many businesses include arbitration clauses), to a final hearing. It should however be noted that Tunisia has established a specialized commercial court known as the Tribunal for Business Law (Tribunal de Commerce). This court is designed to handle commercial disputes more efficiently than general courts and may offer expedited procedures for dispute resolution.
ADR methods can be a more efficient and cost-effective way to resolve commercial disputes and some of the formal ADR procedures available in Tunisia include mediation, conciliation, negotiation and expert determination.
Mediation is a voluntary and non-binding process where a neutral third party, the mediator, helps the parties involved in a dispute reach a mutually acceptable agreement. In Tunisia, mediation is a recognized ADR method, and there are mediation centers and trained mediators who can assist in commercial dispute resolution.
Conciliation is another ADR process that is recognized method for resolving commercial disputes in Tunisia. It involves a neutral third party assisting the parties in reaching an agreement. Whilst it is similar to mediation, conciliation may involve the conciliator offering suggestions or recommendations to help the parties come to a resolution.
Negotiation is the simplest form of dispute resolution and involves the parties discussing their issues directly and attempting to reach an agreement without the involvement of a neutral third party. While not formalized, negotiation is a common method for resolving commercial disputes.
In some cases, expert determination may be used, particularly when the dispute involves technical or industry-specific matters. An independent expert is appointed to make a binding decision on the dispute based on their expertise in the subject matter.
Does engaging in ADR have any effect on potential or existing litigation or arbitration?
Engaging in ADR in Tunisia can have various effects on subsequent litigation or arbitration proceedings, depending on the specific circumstances and the outcome of the ADR process.
Entering into ADR before proceeding with litigation or arbitration can save the parties time and money as it can help them explore potential resolutions and assess the strengths and weaknesses of their positions, which may inform their decisions on whether to pursue formal proceedings. During ADR, parties may exchange information and evidence relating to the dispute. This shared information can be valuable in subsequent litigation or arbitration, as it can help clarify issues and streamline the formal proceedings. The extent to which information, statements, or agreements made during ADR can be used in litigation or arbitration can vary. In some cases, the parties may agree that certain evidence or admissions made during ADR will be admissible in subsequent proceedings. However, in other cases, ADR discussions may be confidential and not admissible in court or arbitration hearings.
With the exception of negotiation, engaging in ADR stops the limitation period from running. If the parties choose to enter into ADR, they can only subsequently go to court by mutual agreement (for example by agreeing to “cancel” an ADR clause) so in effect, entering into ADR suspends recourse to court procedure. Once the ADR process ends or breaks down, the limitation period resumes from when it was paused.
If after litigation or arbitration is commenced, the parties reach a mutually acceptable agreement through mediation, conciliation, or negotiation, they can voluntarily dismiss or settle any ongoing litigation or arbitration. This is often a preferred outcome, as it can save time and resources. The parties can enter into a formal stipulated agreement outlining the terms of their settlement. Such agreements may be submitted to the relevant court or arbitration tribunal, and they can be enforced as legally binding contracts. In the case of litigation, if the parties reach a settlement during the ADR process, they may request the court to dismiss the pending case. In arbitration, the parties can request the arbitration tribunal to terminate the proceedings. The success of ADR can lead to the discontinuation of formal legal processes.
If ADR does not result in a full resolution of the dispute, the parties can return to litigation or arbitration to resolve any remaining issues or disagreements. A partial settlement may lead to a narrowing of the issues that need to be resolved through formal processes.
Is ADR compulsory and if so are there any consequences if a party fails to engage in ADR? If it is not compulsory are there any plans for this to change?
The use of ADR in Tunisia, including whether it is mandated or encouraged by the government, can vary depending on the type of dispute, legal regulations, and the preferences of the parties involved. Tunisia, like many countries, has some specific regulations or statutes that require or encourage ADR in certain types of disputes, such as family law matters. However, ADR is not typically mandated for all cases, and parties often have the flexibility to choose whether they want to engage in ADR or opt for formal litigation or arbitration.
Whilst ADR is generally not compulsory in Tunisia for all types of disputes, there may be specific circumstances where ADR is either mandated or encouraged by law or contractual agreements.
We are unaware of any plans or proposed legislative changes in Tunisia to make ADR compulsory for all types of disputes. However, legal and regulatory developments can occur over time, and the adoption of compulsory ADR measures may be a subject of discussion or consideration by policymakers and legal authorities in Tunisia, in the future.
Can the parties agree, in advance of any potential dispute, to engage in ADR?
Yes, parties in Tunisia can agree in advance to engage in ADR methods as part of their dispute resolution process. It is common for commercial contracts and agreements to include ADR clauses that specify how disputes will be resolved, without resorting to litigation or arbitration. These clauses are often referred to as ADR or dispute resolution clauses.
Typically, such clauses outline the following: 1) choice of ADR method – the parties can specify which ADR methods will be used, such as mediation, conciliation, negotiation, or expert determination and they can also choose to include arbitration clauses, but if they want to focus on non-binding ADR methods, they can explicitly exclude arbitration; 2) procedure for initiating ADR – the clause may describe the process for initiating the ADR procedure, including how to notify the other party, the selection of a mediator or conciliator, and other relevant details; 3) governing law – the clause may specify the governing law that will be used in interpreting the ADR agreement and the resolution of any disputes arising from the ADR process; 4) confidentiality – it is common to include provisions regarding the confidentiality of ADR proceedings and any information or documents shared during the process; 5) enforceability – the parties may stipulate that any settlement or agreement reached through ADR is legally binding and enforceable as a contract; 6) severability – a clause may include a severability provision to ensure that if one part of the ADR clause is found to be unenforceable, the rest of the clause remains in effect.
When does ADR generally take place?
ADR can take place in Tunisia at various stages of a dispute resolution process, depending on the preferences of the parties involved and the specific circumstances of the dispute.
Is ADR subject to without prejudice privilege and/or confidential? If not, is there any other means to protect confidential information?
ADR in Tunisia often operates with a strong emphasis on confidentiality and without prejudice privilege. This can create a unique environment for open and candid discussions during ADR proceedings In Tunisia, ADR methods, such as mediation and conciliation, can often be conducted on a confidential and without prejudice basis. This means that the discussions, negotiations, and documents produced during the ADR process are generally kept confidential, and they cannot be used as evidence in subsequent litigation or arbitration proceedings. This is not however automatic and has to be agreed by the parties.
Does the output from ADR create precedents?
In general, ADR processes, such as mediation and conciliation, do not create legal precedents in the same way that court decisions do. Legal precedents are established when a court renders a judgment or issues a formal decision on a legal issue. ADR, on the other hand, is a private and consensual process where parties voluntarily reach agreements or settlements to resolve their disputes.
Who bears the costs of ADR?
The allocation of costs for ADR in Tunisia can vary depending on the specific circumstances, the agreements between the parties, and the chosen ADR method. Typically the parties share the cost of ADR.
Is your jurisdiction subject to any specific rules for cross border ADR?
Tunisia, like many countries, may be subject to international treaties and conventions that govern cross-border dispute resolution, including cross-border ADR.
Whilst Tunisia is not typically associated with specific international ADR rules, it is a member of several international conventions and organizations that influence cross-border dispute resolution. This includes being a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, commonly known as the New York Convention. This international treaty facilitates the recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards across borders, making it an important component of cross-border ADR in Tunisia. The ICC has established an international arbitration court that parties from different countries can use for resolving cross-border commercial disputes. Tunisia’s legal framework allows for the recognition and enforcement of ICC arbitration awards. The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration is often adopted by countries as a framework for domestic arbitration legislation, including provisions for international arbitration. Tunisia’s arbitration law is influenced by international standards, and it includes provisions aligned with the UNCITRAL Model Law.
Tunisia has bilateral and multilateral treaties with other countries that may address cross-border dispute resolution and ADR mechanisms. These treaties could affect the choice of law, jurisdiction, and enforcement of ADR decisions in specific cases involving those countries. Tunisia is not a party to The United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (Singapore Convention).
Are there any particularly unusual features of ADR in your jurisdiction that you are aware are different to other jurisdictions?
Tunisia has a legal framework for ADR that shares common features with other jurisdictions, but there are some specific nuances.
Tunisia has a civil law legal system, and its legal framework for ADR is primarily codified in the Tunisian Civil Code (Code des Obligations et des Contrats). This code provides a basis for contractual dispute resolution mechanisms and may influence the use of ADR in contractual matters. In certain types of disputes, such as family law matters, Tunisian law may require parties to attempt mediation before initiating formal litigation. However, mandatory mediation provisions may not apply to commercial disputes. Some Tunisian courts offer court-connected mediation services, where mediators are appointed by the court to help parties reach settlements. The availability and specific practices of court-connected mediation may vary by jurisdiction.
In Tunisia, various organizations and centers provide local ADR services, and parties may choose from different providers based on their needs. These providers may offer various ADR methods, such as mediation, conciliation, and negotiation.
In Tunisia, mediators often receive formal training and accreditation from organizations or institutions specializing in ADR. However, specific qualifications and accreditation requirements for mediators may vary, and there may not be standardized qualifications required by law. The availability of trained mediators may depend on the region and specialization. Tunisia’s unique cultural and linguistic context can influence ADR practices. Parties may choose mediators or conciliators who are sensitive to local customs and capable of conducting ADR proceedings in Arabic or French, which are the primary languages used in legal matters.
Contacts
© Eversheds Sutherland. All rights reserved. Eversheds Sutherland is a global provider of legal and other services operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. Eversheds Sutherland is the name and brand under which the members of Eversheds Sutherland Limited (Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP and Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP) and their respective controlled, managed and affiliated firms and the members of Eversheds Sutherland (Europe) Limited (each an "Eversheds Sutherland Entity" and together the "Eversheds Sutherland Entities") provide legal or other services to clients around the world. Eversheds Sutherland Entities are constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local regulatory and legal requirements and operate in accordance with their locally registered names. The use of the name Eversheds Sutherland, is for description purposes only and does not imply that the Eversheds Sutherland Entities are in a partnership or are part of a global LLP. The responsibility for the provision of services to the client is defined in the terms of engagement between the instructed firm and the client.